King Henry’s Stairs and Execution Dock

This week, I am back in Wapping, exploring one of the stairs that line the River Thames – King Henry’s Stairs.

The location of King Henry’s Stairs is shown in the following map. Along Wapping High Street, they are adjacent to Wapping Pier, and opposite Brewhouse Lane (Map © OpenStreetMap contributors):

King Henry's Stairs

The alley that leads to the stairs, opposite Brewhouse Lane:

King Henry's Stairs

The alley is between two of the few remaining undeveloped buildings alongside Wapping High Street. Looking towards the river, the Phoenix Wharf building is on the right and on the left is King Henry’s Wharf. Not yet developed into the standard apartment building which has been the fate of the majority of old warehouses that line the river. I am sure their time will come, indeed Phoenix Wharf has had a number of planning submissions and ownership changes, but nothing yet seems firm as yet.

King Henry's Stairs

King Henry’s Stairs are unusual for a number of reasons. Their current name is not the original name, they have a rather macabre history, and alongside the location of the stairs is the Wapping Pier, with an elevated walkway leading alongside the stairs out to the pier.

The following photo shows the entrance to the stairs down to the river foreshore, with the walkway to the pier on the right:King Henry's Stairs

However looking over the edge, where one would expect to see a series of stone steps leading down to the foreshore, there is nothing but a sheer drop down to the sand and mud below.

On the right, a metal ladder, a couple of feet out from the edge of the stairs, is hooked over the pier, and provides the only access to the foreshore below:

King Henry's Stairs

I stood there for a few moments trying to decide whether the ladder was safe. It looked straight out of a TV hospital drama, where you know what will happen next and anyone risking the ladder would find themselves flat on the ground below.

Swinging one foot out to the ladder, it swung on where it was hooked to the pier, the ladder not being fixed to the ground. Other foot on the ladder, and despite swinging I made it to the ground.

The foot prints in the above photo are mine as I took the photo after getting back up. On arrival the sand and mud was perfectly smooth.

Looking back at the ladder from the foreshore. It may have been fixed at the base at some point, but today is just hooked over the rail alongside the walkway out to the pier. Apart from a couple of steps at the top, there is no evidence of any steps having ever been in place.

King Henry's Stairs

The view back to the entrance. When I arrived, the blue gate was wide open which seems somewhat risky given the lack of stone steps and the abrupt fall to the foreshore.

King Henry's Stairs

Sticking out from the ground, a short distance away from the wall, are two lengths of wood with a metal pole between, They are angled towards the top of the stairs, and give a clue to what was here.

The following photo from the LMA Collage archive shows King Henry’s Stairs in 1971, and explains the wooden remains. There were once a full set of wooden steps leading from the top of the wall down to the foreshore.

King Henry's Stairs

Image credit: London Metropolitan Archives, City of London: catalogue ref: SC_PHL_02_0638_71_35_518_8

There is no indication of the age of the steps in the 1971 photo, however they look in reasonably good condition, and provide a safe route down to the foreshore. There is just under 50 years between the above photo and my photos, which shows the power of the Thames to erode and decay wooden structures. Daily tides, the continual immersion in water followed by exposure to the air and sunlight has reduced these steps to the two wooden stumps we see today.

The view from the foreshore is always worth it. A smooth layer of sand / mud covered in the tide worn remains of London brick, stone, and the lumps of chalk used to provide a smooth base for barges and lighters.

The algae covered walls show the height of the tide, and the old warehouses stare out on a very different Thames to when they were built.

The view looking to the west, towards central London:

King Henry's Stairs

The view to the east, with the towers of the Isle of Dogs behind the Wapping Pier:

King Henry's Stairs

The building on the eastern side of King Henry’s Stairs is King Henry’s Wharf:

King Henry's Stairs

The building probably looks much as it did when barges would be lined up on the foreshore, with the crane moving goods between barge and warehouse.

London Wharves and Docks was a directory of all the wharves and docks along the River Thames. Published by Commercial Motor. The directory provided key details for the hundreds of wharves and docks that lined the river from Teddington to Tilbury. According to the 1954 edition, King Henry’s Wharf was known as St. John’s and King Henry’s Wharves. The occupier was R.G. Hall and the building was owned by W.H.J Alexander Ltd of Leadenhall Street.  The facilities included;

General, dry goods, specifically dealing with cocoa, coffee, sugar, spices, dried and canned fruit, gums and cheeses. The cranage was 60 cwt and the building provided 1,900,000 square feet of storage space. The building included customs facilities and bonding, an examination floor and sufferance. The river facing side of the building had space for barge berths and the depth of water at high tide was 10 feet.

A closer view of the crane on the side of the building:

King Henry's Stairs

On the western side of the stairs is Phoenix Wharf. The Commercial Motor book does not have a listing for a Phoenix Wharf on Wapping High Street so I wonder if this was a name given to the building relatively recently. The small space between Phoenix Wharf and King Henry’s Stairs was Swan Wharf (the 1894 OS map does show a Phoenix Wharf, mainly as open space just to the left).

King Henry's Stairs

Looking back from the water’s edge. Phoenix Wharf on the left, then the open space of Swan Wharf. The walkway to Wapping Pier above. King Henry’s Stairs to the right of the walkway followed by the corner of King Henry’s Wharf.

King Henry's Stairs

I was puzzled by the name of the stairs and the adjacent building – why King Henry?

The earliest use of the name I could find was from 1823 when on the 8th November the London Sun reported: “SINGULAR SUICIDE – on Thursday morning, about two o-clock, a Gentleman went to a waterman plying at King Henry’s Stairs, and asked him to take him across the river in his boat, which he instantly got into, and the waterman proceeded with his passenger. When they had nearly reached the middle of the river, the stranger took off his hat, and in a moment threw himself overboard, after which he was never seen. There is no name in the hat, nor anything that can lead to a discovery of this unfortunate man”.

Newspapers of the later 19th century offered a clue as to the source of the name when they referred to the stairs, for example in the Shipping and Mercantile Gazette on the 7th July 1840, there is an article about a new pier being erected here, and the article states “King Henry’s Stairs, where in ancient times, the monarchs of England landed and embarked”.

What I do not understand is why monarchs of England would have embarked using these stairs in Wapping, in whenever “ancient times” were. As far as I know, there was no establishment or activities such as hunting on this side of the river that would have attracted a monarch, and there were far safer places towards the City for boarding boats.

The same newspaper article also provides an alternate name for the stairs by stating that they were: “commonly called Execution Dock”. I found this to be a recurring reference in 19th century newspaper reports that King Henry’s Stairs were formerly known as Execution Dock.

I checked Rocque’s map of 1746 for help, and in the location of King Henry’s Stairs was the name Execution Dock Stairs (in the middle of the map with the name extending out between ships on the river).

King Henry's Stairs

To confirm that this was the same location, comparing 2020 and 1746 maps confirms some streets in exactly the right location.

The stairs are off the road Wapping High Street (2020) and Wapping Dock (1746), but opposite where these stairs join this road, is a street with the same name and shape on both 1746 and 2020 – Brewhouse Lane. Compare Rocque’s map above with the 2020 map below:

King Henry's Stairs

Execution Dock is used for the name of the stairs in all early maps, always at the same location as King Henry’s Stairs.

The following maps all show Execution Dock at the same location: C. and J. Green (1828), R. Harwood (1799), William Morgan (1682). See the Layers of London site to layer these maps on a contemporary map.

Another example is the following 1755 Parish Map. Although not named, Brewhouse Lane can be seen with the same shape as in the other maps to confirm the location. What I like about this map is that three boats are shown clustered around Execution Dock. This was to show (as confirmed by the earlier newspaper article) that these were stairs where watermen were stationed ready to take a passenger along the river.

King Henry's Stairs

Execution Dock probably needs no introduction – it was the place where those found guilty of crimes at sea when the death sentence was imposed, were taken to be hung.

There was a considerable number of executions here, I have been trawling through records compiling a spreadsheet of dates, names and convictions (yes seriously) but ran out of time to complete for this post, however some example are worth examining to get an idea of the crimes and how the convictions were carried out.

Being executed at Execution Dock was a major spectacle. The authorities probably encouraged this so that “justice was seen to be done”, and it would also act as a major deterrent to those considering similar crimes.

Most references to Execution Dock refer to the crime of Piracy, however you could also be executed there for many other crimes, including Insurance Fraud, such was the fate of one Captain William Codling in 1802.

Captain Codling was on trial for “sinking a ship and cargo with intent to defraud the Underwriters”. It appears that his ship, the Adventure, should have been carrying a quantity of silver, however he had hidden this onshore, and when off Brighton, made holes in the hull of the ship causing her to sink. He and a couple of accomplices could then keep the silver and claim on the insurance – a crime that in 1802 was “an Offence most justly rendered Capital by Statute”.

Captain Codling was found guilt and handed the death sentence. The London Star on the 29th November 1802 carried a detailed account of the execution at Execution Dock:

He was executed on Saturday 27th November and between trial and execution was held at Newgate where since the Friday evening he had been “in solemn devotion and prayer, preparatory to his fatal exit”. His main regret was separation from his wife Jane and his son aged nine.

His wife Jane had traveled to Windsor to try and obtain a pardon from the King, but was not successful, arriving back at Newgate early on Saturday morning, without any success. He had a nephew who assured him that he would look after his wife and son. He appears to have been resigned to his fate, and his main concern was consoling his wife when she returned to the prison:

“The tender scene which now followed would require the pen of the most pathetic writer. The prisoner conducted himself with manly fortitude, and used every argument to console his wife, begging that she would suppress her grief, for that it affected him much more than his own unhappy fate. After some mutual endearments, she became more tranquil, and when they passed about an hour together, Dr Ford, the Ordinary of Newgate, entered, and advised Mrs. Codling to take her last farewell of her husband; Captain Codling himself joined in the request. Any description of their parting scene would appear a mockery of such real woe”.

The article also provided details on the procession that assembled to take Captain Codling from Newgate to Execution Dock. When reading this, consider that this was to guard someone convicted of insurance fraud and was accepting of their fate. The procession was as it was to show the power of the state, the law and judiciary and to act as a very strong deterrent:

“The cart was drawn up by two horses, a board nailed across for a seat, and another as a back to it. The Deputy Marshal was on horseback arranging the constables. Messrs Canner and Holdsworth (the two City Marshals) were likewise on horseback, with their staffs in their hands. A few minutes before nine o’clock the Marshal of the Admiralty arrived in his carriage, with two footmen behind, and the two Sheriffs were next in their carriages. The Rev. Dr. Ford, the Ordinary, followed in his carriage. There were about fourteen of the Sheriffs’ men on horseback to guard the prisoner, whilst the number of constables, all on foot, was about two hundred. Just as St Sepulchre’s clock struck nine, the executioner and his men came out with a pair of steps, which placing them in the back of the cart, they were both ascended. The Under Sheriff, came out with the death warrant in his hand, which he delivered to the Deputy Marshal. he then returned to the prison, and again appeared. conducting the unhappy Captain Codling to the cart and assisting him up the steps.

The mob, which had been collecting for some hours was now immense. the street, lamp-posts, windows and the roofs of the houses, were wonderfully crowded“.

The route taken from Newgate prison was along Ludgate Steet, passing St Paul’s Churchyard, , Cheapside, Leadenhall Street, High Street, Whitechapel, then down Gravel Lane and along to Execution Dock, where the procession arrived at half past ten. The cart was backed up the alley to the stairs.

The crowds in the City were recorded as being larger than for a Lord Mayor’s show. It was market day in Whitechapel, which caused problems getting through the crowds, and along Gravel Lane “the crowd was so great, and the street so narrow, that they were obliged to move very slowly and with great precaution”.

The gallows had been erected about ten to twelve paces from low water mark. Planks had been placed on the mud on which the officials could stand. Then at twenty minutes before eleven, on a signal from the Sheriff “the board was knocked from under his feet, and he was launched into eternity”.

Unfortunately with this method of execution, the end was not so quick. Although he was a weighty man, Captain Codling “struggled hard for three or four minutes”. After being left for a further fifteen minutes, he was taken down, covered with a black cloth, and his body was put into a boat to be taken away.

Captain Codling was described as “a stout well-made man, about 45 years of age – the complexion of a man used to the sea – very pleasing and affable in his manner; and prior to this, bore an extreme good character. he was dressed in double breasted blue coat, with guilt buttons and black collar”.

A print of an execution at Execution Dock in 1795, seven years before Captain William Codling, so probably very similar.

King Henry's Stairs

Image credit: London Metropolitan Archives, City of London: catalogue ref: p7491142

To the rear of the above print is a church tower. This is the tower of St Mary, Rotherhithe.

Unfortunately, Wapping Pier obscures the view of the church today from King Henry’s Stairs:

King Henry's Stairs

I took the following photo a little to the west of King Henry’s Stairs, the location of the stairs is marked by the red arrow. The church tower can be seen on the opposite bank.

King Henry's Stairs

Executions at Execution Dock covered many different crimes, the common factor being that the crimes happened at sea:

  • May 1701, Captain William Kidd was hung for piracy and murder and his body hung in chains off Tilbury
  • March 1734, the pirate Williams was executed and his body left to hang in chains
  • March 1737, four unnamed pirates were hung on the same day and left in chains
  • For the worst offences, the bodies of those executed would be left hanging from the gallows, or their bodies would be left in a cage for the tide to pass over them. Penalties were severe for anyone removing a body. In January 1739, a reward of £100 was being offered for information on who cut down and removed the body of James Buchanan
  • in January 1743, Thomas Rounce, who had been convicted for high treason by fighting against his King and country in a Spanish privateer was hung, drawn and quartered at Execution Dock
  • December 1781, William Payne, Matthew Knight and James Sweetman were hung after being convicted of Felony and piracy on the high seas. The bodies of Knight and Sweetman were hung in chains at Execution Dock, however the town of Yarmouth had applied to the Admiralty for the body of Payne, so it could be hung in chains on the coast at Yarmouth as a deterrent
  • In July 1800, James Wilson was executed after being convicted of fighting against his country, on board a French privateer
  • In July 1806, Akow ” a tartar” was executed for the willful murder of one of his countrymen on board the Travers, an East indiaman, on the high seas
  • In June 1809, Captain J. Sutherland was executed after being convicted of murdering his cabin boy – a crime of which he was protesting his innocence all the way to the gallows

Some of the crimes which carried a sentence of death seem relatively trivial. In December 1769, six “pirates” were hung in one day at Execution Dock. Edward Pinnel was hung for sinking and destroying a merchant ship, the five others; Thomas Ailsbre, Samuel Ailsbre, William Grearey, William Wenham and Rchard Hide were sentenced to death for entering a Dutch ship two leagues from Beachy Head and stealing sixty hats.

Newspaper reports of the execution of the six men provide an account from the time of how these events proceeded “They appeared very hardened and seemed totally ignorant and careless about the sudden transition they were going to make. the principal of them even wore a blue cockade in his hat, and when they arrived at the place of execution, he bow’d his neck to the halter and threw his hat among the populace. It is thought that more hardened wretches were scarce ever seen. From the great number of people that pressed to see the punishment of the above unhappy men, the great rails along a wharf near Execution-dock gave way, and above 60 people fell over the wharf; by which accident several of them were much bruised and one man killed”.

Executions at Execution Dock would decline in the first decades of the 19th century. The execution of George Davies and William Watts in December 1830 for the crime of piracy was recorded as being the first at Execution Dock for ten years. They would also be the last people executed on the foreshore of the River Thames.

From the 1830s onward, references to Execution Dock were for the normal occurrences at any of the Thames Stairs – accidents on boats close to the stairs, theft, boats for sale, bodies being found, problems experienced by the waterman with difficult passengers, fires and floods etc.

In the latter decades of the 19th century, references to Execution Dock turned from day to day events to historic tales of those who had been executed. I suspect that the new name of King Henry’s Stairs was gradually taking over, but it took some time as a name with the resonance of Execution Dock would take many years to be replaced in the conversations and memory of those who lived and worked in Wapping.

The name change was possibly down to the growth in Victorian trade and industry along the river’s edge at Wapping. To the Victorian businessman, the area was a place to be celebrated for trade and industry, rather than looking back at the barbaric practices of the past.

There is much speculation regarding the exact location of Execution Dock. Maps dating back to 1682 show what are now King Henry’s Stairs as Execution Dock, and the location in respect to Brewhouse Lane is the same. The change in name occurs in the first half of the 19th century, with the earliest use of King Henry’s Stairs being in 1823, with the name growing in use throughout the 19th century, as use of the name Execution Dock declines.

Many sites along the Thames at Wapping have claimed to be the location of Execution Dock, for example the Prospect of Whitby pub has a noose hanging from a gallows over the foreshore at the rear of the pub:

King Henry's Stairs

I suspect that King Henry’s Stairs / Execution Dock was the central location for executions, but in the hundreds of years that the practice was carried out, the location shifted along the foreshore to east and west of the stairs as the mud and foreshore shifted, to move around obstructions such as moored boats, building work facing on to the river, perhaps for the more notorious executions, the need to ensure good visibility of the execution from the shore and from boats on the river also dictated the location.

It is a very different place today – the view looking east from Execution Dock. hard to image the scenes that occurred here and where poor Captain William Codling was hung for the crime of insurance fraud.

King Henry's StairsI have not been able to find out why King Henry’s Stairs was used as the name for the stairs. Were the stairs named after the adjacent King Henry Wharf, or was the wharf named after the stairs – what was here first? I need to find some detailed maps of the area around the 1820s when the name appears to have been first used.

After leaving the foreshore, I climbed back up the ladder and stepped across to the top of the river wall, where the missing stairs should be leading down to the foreshore. I closed the gate as I headed back to Wapping High Street as if you were not too careful, and were expecting stairs, a nasty fall into the river or the foreshore could be the result – and there have been far too many deaths here over the centuries.

31 thoughts on “King Henry’s Stairs and Execution Dock

  1. David ayres

    Another great story
    Sterling moss and Ronny Scot were born in wrapping
    And Daniel farson put it on the map. The fuchsia was discovered there on a sailors window sill
    Try smith restaurant well worth a visit
    David Ayres

  2. Donna Reeves

    I note the “guilt” buttons on Captain Codling’s blue coat – just the thing for an execution! As always a fascinating read.

  3. Jane Froggatt

    This was so interesting as I had ancestors that lived in Red Lyon Street in 1871 and could picture them walking down these steps in those days. I have not done any research this side of the river yet and long to visit here when we are allowed. My James family lived on the other side of the river at Horsleydown. George James, my great grandfather married Sarah Jane Beer, my great grandmother in 1878, and just noticed that she was born in 1853 in Limehouse, Wapping! I didn’t realise till now that she lived on the other side of the river? He was a lighterman so could have walked up these stairs? I wonder how they met? In 1881 they are living at The Ship Inn, 94, Shad Thames with her mother Matilda Beer. She is a widow and her husband John Henry Beer is dead and he was a stevedor in Wapping in 1871 census? Its starting to take shape now. Thank you for this information. Its fascinating!

  4. Lori

    I wonder if they faced the prisoner towards the Thames on the gallows ? Preferable to have that river scene as the last thing you would ever see rather than the faces of the mob gawping.

    So much history in such an obscure riverside alley, thank you for revealing it to us.

  5. Richard Thomas

    I loved my time exploring along here, but surprised the gate was open as at my last viist it wa padlocked… Nice article which brings the past and the present together nicely..

  6. Janice

    Thank you again.
    My Wilson ancestors who were lightermen/watermen are in a census around mid 1800`s as living in Lower Gun Alley, a street now disappeared but in the Roque map I see that Gun Wharf is just along from the stairs named as Execution Stairs. In the modern map Gun Alley looks like it would be where the Phoenix warehouse and Captain Kidd pub are now.

  7. Ann Pearson

    Re Phoenix Wharf. The name perhaps suggests rebuilding after a fire since the mythical phoenix arises from the ashes of its predecessor. Just a thought.

    Another fascinating exploration, reaching us eight hours late out here on the west coast of Canada. My historian partner and I both enjoy this weekly treat which gives us an ever-lengthening list of new walks for our next visit to London (which we hope won’t be indefinitely postponed by Covid).
    Ann Pearson

  8. Janice

    Hi Anne I too am on the west coast of Canada right now where I spend 6 months of the year as my partner`s here.
    Interesting observation that there might have been a fire and then renaming of the stairs. You`ll see from my comments that my ancestors lived nearby in Victorian times up until my grandfather left during WW1. He never talked about living there as he felt in many ways that he`d bettered himself and didn`t want to drag up unhappy memories.

  9. john Cardorka

    What a Excellent and informative read,I have lived near wapping all my life, I am now in my 70s, keep them coming about wapping and the Thames.

  10. Jo W

    Yet another very interesting read,Admin. You really work hard at the research,don’t you?
    P.s. Well done for closing the gate behind you! No obvious warning notices,were there?

  11. bex

    Fantastic! Interesting as always. i thank you for taking the time to do all the trawling for us. I am now compelled to visit Wapping.

  12. sally pennock

    Always a fascinating read, (thank you) and especially this one as I live in one of the converted warehouses you feature in this article. I am interested in your comment that redevelopment is the ‘fate’ of many of the warehouse buildings along the Thames as if that’s a bad thing. I wonder what you would prefer happened to them? There is of course no more ‘dock’ trade that gave them their original purpose so to be re-born as appreciated places to live seems a blessing rather than a ‘fate’- demolition would have been another alternative.. Our building is listed and lovingly cared for to preserve it’s majesty. That doesn’t seem to be too ‘fateful’ to me!

    1. admin Post author

      Hi Sally, thanks for your comment and you make a really good point. I agree that the warehouse conversions are far more preferable to demolition. They are wonderful buildings and have been converted to their current use well, in the majority of cases the exterior has been extremely well preserved. My worry with London is how many areas are losing their diversity of use, and that is what I was trying to say with the comment regarding their fate. It would be good to see if there was some alternate use which preserved the buildings, so that Wapping High Street is not just interesting from an architectural and historical viewpoint, but also from a variety of activities.

      That is the point I was trying to make (not very well I must admit – I spend most of my time with my posts trying to make sure I get the historical information factually correct). Not that conversions to apartments is bad – it is not, and those along Wapping High Street have been done well. Just that it would be good to see a diversity of use of these buildings.

      Hope that makes sense, and thanks for your interest in the blog – David

  13. KayArCee

    Thank you for a wonderful read. I was wondering if you have any info stories re the Alderman’s Stairs a short walk back towards St Katherines Docks?
    For some unknown reason they have fascinated me ever since I walked past them on a day trip to Tower Bridge. It would be great to know their story as well. For anyone interested, the stairs there are intact and lead down to the foreshore. MInd your step it can be slippery.

  14. Clive

    Fascinating article, and at last someone else who believes that Execution Dock was at King Henry’s Stairs! All the old maps point towards this place, opposite the end of Brewhouse Lane. However, I like your theory that executions may well have taken place below a number of the stairs on the Wapping stretch of the river, as circumstances required. The Prospect of Whitby (complete with sample gibbet), the Captain Kidd pub (very close – likely renamed after his demise close by from another name?), opposite the Town of Ramsgate pub, or even the old wharf building with the ‘E’ atop it near Wapping New Stairs have all claimed it, but the site of the now-named King Henry’s Stairs wins out. Phoenix Wharf to the west of the stairs was previously ‘Swan Wharf’ on the 1893 25″ OS map, adjoining ‘Anchor Mills (disused)’ on the same site. As to the name of the stairs – I’ve had my own theory that it was given that name as a nod to King Henry VIII, who in 1536 brought in a law putting Piracy under the jurisdiction of the High Court of Admiralty. Either that, or it was because there is or was a King Edward’s Stairs just down river the other side of Wapping Dock Stairs, and it seemed only fair.
    My 2nd Great paternal Grandfather lived in Whitechapel during at least the 1850s to 1870s. If only I could have asked him!

  15. Colin Burford

    I have only just picked up on this article, but was fascinated by the content. So interesting & informative,
    will definitely be making a pilgrimage down there to soak up and imagine the scene. Well done ✅

  16. Neil

    Fascinating. I happened to walk past this week on a walk from tower hill to canary wharf. I wasn’t brave enough to venture to the shore much because I don’t recall seeing the ladders, think they’ve nicked or removed.

  17. Dominic Pinto

    Under planning ref: PA/13/00982 and 00983, planning permission and listed
    building consent were approved on 02 May 2014 for the change of use of the
    existing wharf buildings (King Henry’s Wharf and Phoenix Wharf) to provide
    35 residential units, the creation of a new three-storey dwelling house (on land
    formerly occupied by Swan Wharf), and the erection of new five storey
    building (on land on the north-western corner of the junction of Wapping High
    St and Brewhouse Lane) to provide 18 affordable units.:

    PA/13/00982/A1 | Change of use of the existing wharf buildings (King Henry’s Wharf and Phoenix Wharf) to provide 35 residential units, the creation of a new three-storey dwellinghouse (on land formerly occupied by Swan Wharf), and the erection of new five storey building (on land on the north-western corner of the junction of Wapping High St and Brewhouse Lane) to provide 18 affordable units. | King Henrys Wharf, Phoenix Wharf, Swan Wharf and Corner of Wapping High Street And Brewhouse Lane, London

    Both King Henry’s Wharf and Phoenix Wharf are Grade II Listed buildings.

    There’s more, and some more recent pix, recent details, though at that time (2016?) development didn’t seem to have started:

  18. Dominic Pinto

    On further, and closer, checking, the Historic England listing has:

    List Entry Name:

    Statutory Address:

    St John’s Warf itself being slightly further to the west – see this photo in the London Picture Archive

    And another view of King Henry’s Wharves, and the entry to the Stairs, from the same Archive

  19. Dominic Pinto

    And as to ‘I was puzzled by the name of the stairs and the adjacent building – why King Henry?’ …

    No source is given – this is part of the comment associated with a photograph on flickr taken in 2011:

    “King Henry’s Wharf is still used as a warehouse. The name of this wharf and Gun Wharf recall the Tudor cannon foundry which Henry VIII set up here to manufacturer guns for his ships.”

    See also a less than positive post:

    118-120 King Henry’s Wharf. This group of warehouses was owned by the Alexander Tug Company but operated by Hall Wharfage. The wharf was used for handling and storage of sugar and bonded facilities. The name of this wharf recall the alleged Tudor cannon foundry which Henry VIII set up here to make guns for his ships.

    In connection with Phoenix Wharf, the same blog observes:

    ‘A small warehouse which was once a flour mill. Built 1840 by Sydney Smirke. Converted to flats 1996.’

    Again, no sources are apparent.

  20. Dominic Pinto

    The reference to the Alexander Tug Co., and your own above ‘According to the 1954 edition, King Henry’s Wharf was known as St. John’s and King Henry’s Wharves. The occupier was R.G. Hall and the building was owned by W.H.J Alexander Ltd of Leadenhall Street.’ prompted an inevitable further search and led to Thames Tugs, from whence is excerpted:

    “William Henry James Alexander was born at Gravesend in 1858. He was apprenticed as a waterman and moved to Wapping, close to the Pool of London, where he remained for most of his life. He became a wharfinger and starting from quite a junior position rose to manage the business owned by Messrs. Hall and Gregory involved in the storage of sugar products. When the opportunity arose he took over the provision of lighterage services to the business. He eventually came to control both the St. John’s Wharf and the King Henry Wharf. A major customer was the Tate refinery (Tate & Lyle after 1921) at the time the biggest sugar refiner in the world.”

    From a page in an 1891 trades’ directory:

    Hall R. G. & Co. St. John’s wharf & bonded warehouses, 278 Wapping High street E;
    King Henry’s & Trinity wharves, Wapping E & 22 Commercial sale rooms E C

    This is said to have extracts from street directories from earlier – 1832 and images from 1842 – for Wapping High Street.

    St John’s Wharf is referenced in 1832 adjacent to the Swan 230 Wapping High Street; in 1842, about where you might expect to see it, there’s no reference to the Swan. Instead, there’s at, or adjacent to, 222 The Tunnel Pier, Wheatsheaf Wharf, Tyne Coal Wharf, Hope Wharf, and at 238 Chapman & Woodyer coal merchants, Tunnel Steam Boat Pier, Patton and Charles wharfingers, 242 East London Lime Wharf, Jones Wm & Co lime merchants, Jones Wm hatter, Johnson Wm “Ship”, and then Execution Dock, and next at 244 Garbutt Rbt, bricklayer Pavitt & Co millers


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *